"Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors ..." -- U.S. Constitution
Ask your legislators to pass National Popular Vote

ZIP:
Endorsed by 2,110
State Legislators
In addition to 1,129 state legislative sponsors (shown above), 981 other legislators have cast recorded votes in favor of the National Popular Vote bill.
Progress by State

Tom Golisano

Entrepreneur Tom Golisano Endorses National Popular Vote

Short Explanation
The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee a majority of the Electoral College to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The bill would reform the Electoral College so that the electoral vote in the Electoral College reflects the choice of the nation's voters for President of the United States.   more
11 Enactments
The National Popular Vote bill has been enacted into law in states possessing 165 electoral votes — 61% of the 270 electoral votes needed to activate the legislation.

  • Maryland - 10 votes
  • Massachusetts - 11
  • Washington - 12 votes
  • Vermont - 3 votes
  • Rhode Island - 4 votes
  • DC - 3 votes
  • Hawaii - 4 votes
  • New Jersey - 14 votes
  • Illinois - 20 votes
  • New York - 29 votes
  • California - 55 votes

  • Videos

    Fox Interview

    CBS Video

    Popular Vote

    Class Election

    more videos

    Advisory Board
    John Anderson (R-I–IL)
    Birch Bayh (D–IN)
    John Buchanan (R–AL)
    Tom Campbell (R–CA)
    Tom Downey (D–NY)
    D. Durenberger (R–MN)
    Jake Garn (R–UT)
    What Do You Think
    How should we elect the President?
    The candidate who gets the most votes in all 50 states.
    The current Electoral College system.

    Add this poll to your web site
    Salem News
    My View: National Popular Vote makes sense
    Salem News Op-Ed
    By Michael S. Dukakis
    July 27, 2010

    Something happened in the 2000 presidential election that should never be permitted to happen again. The candidate who failed to win the popular vote became president of the United States.

    Something just as unacceptable almost happened four years later. If John Kerry had won Ohio by a single vote, he would have become president even though George W. Bush would have won the popular vote by over 31/2 million votes.

    I think it's high time we got rid of the Electoral College and elected our presidents the way we elect every other elected official in the country — by a vote of the people. The overwhelming majority of the American people think so, too.

    The cause is not a new one. No other provision of the Constitution has engendered more proposed constitutional amendments. In fact, when President Nixon tried to abolish the Electoral College in 1969, he won an overwhelming majority in the House of Representatives only to be thwarted by a minority in the Senate, as it takes two-thirds of both branches of Congress and three-quarters of the states to pass a constitutional amendment.

    Fortunately, we now have a way to eliminate the negative impact of the Electoral College without going through the long and tedious process of amending the Constitution: the National Popular Vote plan. It is critically important that our state joins Maryland, New Jersey, Illinois, Washington, and Hawaii in approving this bill.

    Why is it so important to pass this legislation? Because under the current system, running for president means just one thing: Focus on the so-called swing states. I did it. Al Gore did it. John Kerry and Barack Obama did it, and our Republican opponents did it, too.

    A big turnout in Massachusetts and more than two-thirds of the other states is irrelevant to winning the election. Only winning the swing states matters, and presidential candidates are under tremendous pressure to embrace issues and positions that will resonate in those few states. In fact, it is not an exaggeration to say that in the past several presidential elections, candidates have spent almost all of their time between Labor Day and Election Day in about six states. That's not healthy, and it's not right.

    For the first time in decades, our votes — for both the losing and the winning candidate — will actually matter. That's because each vote in Massachusetts will be added to all the other votes across the country to determine the winner, just like in all other elections. Because the margin of victory will matter, National Popular Vote will increase voter participation and put a premium on strong and effective grassroots organizing in all states — something that happens to be a particular passion of mine.

    Finally National Popular Vote will not hurt small states. Small states get a theoretical boost from the extra votes they get in the Electoral College. But that boost has no real impact. Small states except New Hampshire have been safe states for one party or the other for decades and are ignored by presidential candidates.

    We have a historic opportunity to join with other states to fix the Electoral College system once and for all by passing the National Popular Vote bill.

    It's the right thing to do for the country. It will ensure that the candidate with the most votes wins and will put voters in spectator states like ours on a level playing field with voters in the swing states.


    Michael S. Dukakis, a Brookline resident, is former governor of the commonwealth and was the Democratic nominee for president in 1988.


    Reform the Electoral College so that the electoral vote reflects the nationwide popular vote for President