"Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors ..." -- U.S. Constitution
Ask your legislators to pass National Popular Vote

Endorsed by 2,110
State Legislators
In addition to 1,129 state legislative sponsors (shown above), 981 other legislators have cast recorded votes in favor of the National Popular Vote bill.
Progress by State

Tom Golisano

Entrepreneur Tom Golisano Endorses National Popular Vote

Short Explanation
The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee a majority of the Electoral College to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The bill would reform the Electoral College so that the electoral vote in the Electoral College reflects the choice of the nation's voters for President of the United States.   more
11 Enactments
The National Popular Vote bill has been enacted into law in states possessing 165 electoral votes — 61% of the 270 electoral votes needed to activate the legislation.

  • Maryland - 10 votes
  • Massachusetts - 11
  • Washington - 12 votes
  • Vermont - 3 votes
  • Rhode Island - 4 votes
  • DC - 3 votes
  • Hawaii - 4 votes
  • New Jersey - 14 votes
  • Illinois - 20 votes
  • New York - 29 votes
  • California - 55 votes

  • Videos

    Fox Interview

    CBS Video

    Popular Vote

    Class Election

    more videos

    Advisory Board
    John Anderson (R-I–IL)
    Birch Bayh (D–IN)
    John Buchanan (R–AL)
    Tom Campbell (R–CA)
    Tom Downey (D–NY)
    D. Durenberger (R–MN)
    Jake Garn (R–UT)
    What Do You Think
    How should we elect the President?
    The candidate who gets the most votes in all 50 states.
    The current Electoral College system.

    Add this poll to your web site
    Sacramento Bee
    Bill to change how California picks a president clears Legislature
    By Bill Sanders
    July 14, 2011

    California would give all its electoral votes to the presidential candidate receiving the most popular votes nationwide under legislation that was sent Thursday to Gov. Jerry Brown.

    Assembly Bill 459 cleared its final legislative hurdle by passing the Assembly, 51–12, with little Republican support.

    The measure by Assemblyman Jerry Hill, D–San Mateo, comes more than a decade after Republican presidential candidate George W. Bush edged Democrat Al Gore despite getting 544,000 fewer votes nationwide.

    In 2004, the tables nearly were turned by Democrats, however, when John Kerry would have defeated Bush — despite 3 million fewer votes nationwide — if he had garnered Ohio's electoral votes by swaying 60,000 more GOP voters to his side.

    AB 459 would commit California to a compact in which each participating state would agree to abide by the national popular vote for president.

    Thus, a candidate potentially could be rejected Californians at the ballot box yet win all the state's 55 electoral votes.

    The compact would not become effective until its member states control a majority of the Electoral College's 538 votes. Eight states and the District of Columbia have given thumbs up so far, totaling 74 electoral votes.

    Brown has not announced a position on AB 459 and typically does not commit himself prior to signing or vetoing a bill.

    Hill contends that California is at a severe disadvantage under the current "winner take all" system that awards all the Golden State's electoral votes to the presidential candidate who finishes first in statewide balloting.

    Because California's voter rolls are dominated by Democrats, who hold a 13-point advantage in voter registration, there is little chance of a GOP presidential candidate winning — and little reason for either party to campaign extensively in the state, according to supporters of AB 459.

    Hill argues that his bill would force presidential candidates to court California voters by taking interest in agriculture, water, high-tech, trade and other issues important to its residents.

    Assemblyman Dan Logue, a Linda Republican who opposed AB 459, characterized it as a partisan power play.

    Because most votes are located in urban areas, which tend to be Democratic strongholds, the bill would prompt presidential candidates to focus on large cities at the expense of rural areas where GOP registration is strong, he said.

    Hill countered that the population of large cities nationwide represents only a small fraction of voters, so presidential candidates would hurt themselves by courting only urban voters.

    Legislation similar to AB 459 was vetoed by former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2006 and 2008.

    Schwarzenegger's veto message in 2008 said that the issue should be put to a vote of the people because it represents "a major shift in the way not only Californians but all Americans choose their president."

    Reform the Electoral College so that the electoral vote reflects the nationwide popular vote for President